<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Presentations, Proclamations, &amp; Predictions: FrameMaker 8, RoboHelp &amp; Technical Communication Tools</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thecontentwrangler.com/2007/02/21/presentations_proclamations_and_predictions_adobe_framemaker_robohelp_techn/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thecontentwrangler.com/2007/02/21/presentations_proclamations_and_predictions_adobe_framemaker_robohelp_techn/</link>
	<description>Content is a business asset worthy of being managed</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 01:51:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: RJ Jacquez</title>
		<link>http://thecontentwrangler.com/2007/02/21/presentations_proclamations_and_predictions_adobe_framemaker_robohelp_techn/comment-page-1/#comment-96</link>
		<dc:creator>RJ Jacquez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 21:37:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost:8888/ee/?p=556#comment-96</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Cindy,
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
My name is RJ Jacquez and I&#8217;m the Product Evangelist for our new Adobe Technical Communication at Adobe and I wanted to chime in and let you know that even though we are no longer including WebWorks Publisher Standard Edition in the FrameMaker 8 box, you can still produce the same output you are accustomed to by using Quadralay&#8217;s full product called ePublisher.&#160; Furthermore, you can also use Mif2Go from Omni Systems and of course the latest version of RoboHelp, included in the Adobe Technical Suite now handles FrameMaker documents natively, including FrameMaker books.&#160; Hope this helps.
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Cindy,
</p>
<p>
My name is RJ Jacquez and I&#8217;m the Product Evangelist for our new Adobe Technical Communication at Adobe and I wanted to chime in and let you know that even though we are no longer including WebWorks Publisher Standard Edition in the FrameMaker 8 box, you can still produce the same output you are accustomed to by using Quadralay&#8217;s full product called ePublisher.&nbsp; Furthermore, you can also use Mif2Go from Omni Systems and of course the latest version of RoboHelp, included in the Adobe Technical Suite now handles FrameMaker documents natively, including FrameMaker books.&nbsp; Hope this helps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cindy</title>
		<link>http://thecontentwrangler.com/2007/02/21/presentations_proclamations_and_predictions_adobe_framemaker_robohelp_techn/comment-page-1/#comment-95</link>
		<dc:creator>cindy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 15:40:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost:8888/ee/?p=556#comment-95</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Is RoboHelp the only option for FrameMaker 8? We were using WebWorks Publisher Standard Edition 8 with FM 7.2 and have hit a stumbling block on which help creation tool to use for FM 8 since Standard Edition is not compliant.
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is RoboHelp the only option for FrameMaker 8? We were using WebWorks Publisher Standard Edition 8 with FM 7.2 and have hit a stumbling block on which help creation tool to use for FM 8 since Standard Edition is not compliant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr Kearby</title>
		<link>http://thecontentwrangler.com/2007/02/21/presentations_proclamations_and_predictions_adobe_framemaker_robohelp_techn/comment-page-1/#comment-94</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr Kearby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 14:26:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost:8888/ee/?p=556#comment-94</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;RJ put on a very thorough presentation. I was happy to see that he wasn&#8217;t just going throug the motions but instead that he really knew how to use both FrameMaker and RoboHelp. Also, Jimmy John&#8217;s is awesome.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Anyway, I was wondering if anyone knows of and/or has links to information regarding RoboHelp Server 6. I&#8217;m particularly interested in the extent to which it handles support for Help in .NET applications. I simply can&#8217;t find any information on the subject other than simple variations on Adobe&#8217;s official product overview for RH Server 6.
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RJ put on a very thorough presentation. I was happy to see that he wasn&#8217;t just going throug the motions but instead that he really knew how to use both FrameMaker and RoboHelp. Also, Jimmy John&#8217;s is awesome.
</p>
<p>
Anyway, I was wondering if anyone knows of and/or has links to information regarding RoboHelp Server 6. I&#8217;m particularly interested in the extent to which it handles support for Help in .NET applications. I simply can&#8217;t find any information on the subject other than simple variations on Adobe&#8217;s official product overview for RH Server 6.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ScottAbel</title>
		<link>http://thecontentwrangler.com/2007/02/21/presentations_proclamations_and_predictions_adobe_framemaker_robohelp_techn/comment-page-1/#comment-93</link>
		<dc:creator>ScottAbel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2007 13:17:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost:8888/ee/?p=556#comment-93</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Amanda:
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
I certainly hear what you are saying. I think it&#8217;s difficult to break habits, including the use of authoring tools. It&#8217;s likely a comfort factor...as moving authors from unstructured FrameMaker to structured XML authoring can be scary. Perhaps it&#8217;s the print paradigm we&#8217;re used to....perhaps it&#8217;s the WYSIWYG approach. Either way, it&#8217;s safe to say that overcoming style issues are often an impediment to moving toward&#8212;especially when there are confusing terms in the mix (DTDs vs EDDs, for instance).
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Thanks for sharing your experience at the Adobe session. We appreciate it.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Scott Abel
&lt;br /&gt;
TheContentWrangler.com
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amanda:
</p>
<p>
I certainly hear what you are saying. I think it&#8217;s difficult to break habits, including the use of authoring tools. It&#8217;s likely a comfort factor&#8230;as moving authors from unstructured FrameMaker to structured XML authoring can be scary. Perhaps it&#8217;s the print paradigm we&#8217;re used to&#8230;.perhaps it&#8217;s the WYSIWYG approach. Either way, it&#8217;s safe to say that overcoming style issues are often an impediment to moving toward&#8212;especially when there are confusing terms in the mix (DTDs vs EDDs, for instance).
</p>
<p>
Thanks for sharing your experience at the Adobe session. We appreciate it.
</p>
<p>
Scott Abel<br />
<br />
TheContentWrangler.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amanda_Cross</title>
		<link>http://thecontentwrangler.com/2007/02/21/presentations_proclamations_and_predictions_adobe_framemaker_robohelp_techn/comment-page-1/#comment-92</link>
		<dc:creator>Amanda_Cross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2007 00:23:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost:8888/ee/?p=556#comment-92</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I was at the presentation on the 9th, but I am not that gung-ho about the Adobe products.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
I have a certain amount of irrational resentment toward Frame already. My career-long Frame-using coworkers are so indoctrinated that I&#8217;m having a difficult time shifting their paradigm. When I talk about separating content from presentation, they look at me like I&#8217;m speaking a different language.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
So, when RJ told someone in the audience that EDDs were better than DTDs because the lack of formatting rules is a deficiency of the DTD, I was ready to start chucking tomatoes. Thankfully, there weren&#8217;t any tomatoes, just some lovely deli sandwiches, and I wasn&#8217;t about to let those go to waste.
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was at the presentation on the 9th, but I am not that gung-ho about the Adobe products.
</p>
<p>
I have a certain amount of irrational resentment toward Frame already. My career-long Frame-using coworkers are so indoctrinated that I&#8217;m having a difficult time shifting their paradigm. When I talk about separating content from presentation, they look at me like I&#8217;m speaking a different language.
</p>
<p>
So, when RJ told someone in the audience that EDDs were better than DTDs because the lack of formatting rules is a deficiency of the DTD, I was ready to start chucking tomatoes. Thankfully, there weren&#8217;t any tomatoes, just some lovely deli sandwiches, and I wasn&#8217;t about to let those go to waste.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

