<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Plain English Is Good, But Simplified English Is Better: One Writer&#8217;s View</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thecontentwrangler.com/2007/05/07/plain_english_is_good_but_simplified_english_is_better_one_writers_view/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thecontentwrangler.com/2007/05/07/plain_english_is_good_but_simplified_english_is_better_one_writers_view/</link>
	<description>Content is a business asset worthy of being managed</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:31:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Merle Tenney</title>
		<link>http://thecontentwrangler.com/2007/05/07/plain_english_is_good_but_simplified_english_is_better_one_writers_view/comment-page-1/#comment-121</link>
		<dc:creator>Merle Tenney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 06:27:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost:8888/ee/?p=502#comment-121</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;In the body of the article we find this rule:
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&#8220;Tenses are controlled. For example, you cannot use the present perfect tense. Typically, you would write the sentence using the simple past tense.&#8221;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
And then in the About the Author section we have this biographical information:
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&#8220;Mike Unwalla helps people to use complex software. He has been writing user documentation for software companies since 1995.&#8221;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Given the writing rule and the ambiguity of the word &#8220;since&#8221;, shouldn&#8217;t the last sentence be this:
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&#8220;He wrote user documentation for software from 1995 until now.&#8221;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;img src=&quot;http://thecontentwrangler.com/images/smileys/grin.gif&quot; width=&quot;19&quot; height=&quot;19&quot; alt=&quot;grin&quot; style=&quot;border:0;&quot; /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
My vote, for the record, is to ignore the rule and keep the bio as is.
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the body of the article we find this rule:
</p>
<p>
&#8220;Tenses are controlled. For example, you cannot use the present perfect tense. Typically, you would write the sentence using the simple past tense.&#8221;
</p>
<p>
And then in the About the Author section we have this biographical information:
</p>
<p>
&#8220;Mike Unwalla helps people to use complex software. He has been writing user documentation for software companies since 1995.&#8221;
</p>
<p>
Given the writing rule and the ambiguity of the word &#8220;since&#8221;, shouldn&#8217;t the last sentence be this:
</p>
<p>
&#8220;He wrote user documentation for software from 1995 until now.&#8221;
</p>
<p>
<img src="http://thecontentwrangler.com/images/smileys/grin.gif" width="19" height="19" alt="grin" style="border:0;" />
</p>
<p>
My vote, for the record, is to ignore the rule and keep the bio as is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

