<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Too Many Words</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thecontentwrangler.com/2008/01/14/too_many_words/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thecontentwrangler.com/2008/01/14/too_many_words/</link>
	<description>Content is a business asset worthy of being managed</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 01:29:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joe Bachana</title>
		<link>http://thecontentwrangler.com/2008/01/14/too_many_words/comment-page-1/#comment-224</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Bachana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 21:06:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost:8888/ee/?p=389#comment-224</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Terrific article Don! Keep them coming&#8230;
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Terrific article Don! Keep them coming&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Unwalla</title>
		<link>http://thecontentwrangler.com/2008/01/14/too_many_words/comment-page-1/#comment-223</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Unwalla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 09:45:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost:8888/ee/?p=389#comment-223</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Great article, thank you Don.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Although Simplified English is designed for the aerospace industry, controlled language can be used in all technical communication, whatever the industry.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
I&#8217;m always surprised when I read about technical writers who object to controlled language because &#8220;it stifles linguistic creativity.&#8221; That kind of creativity has no place in technical communication. (I&#8217;m referring to hard-core tech docs, not product brochures, web sites, and the like.)
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article, thank you Don.
</p>
<p>
Although Simplified English is designed for the aerospace industry, controlled language can be used in all technical communication, whatever the industry.
</p>
<p>
I&#8217;m always surprised when I read about technical writers who object to controlled language because &#8220;it stifles linguistic creativity.&#8221; That kind of creativity has no place in technical communication. (I&#8217;m referring to hard-core tech docs, not product brochures, web sites, and the like.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
