<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hard Truths About Content Conversion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thecontentwrangler.com/2009/02/14/hard_truths_about_content_conversion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thecontentwrangler.com/2009/02/14/hard_truths_about_content_conversion/</link>
	<description>Content is a business asset worthy of being managed</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:31:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Vanderveen</title>
		<link>http://thecontentwrangler.com/2009/02/14/hard_truths_about_content_conversion/comment-page-1/#comment-485</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Vanderveen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 13:02:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost:8888/ee/?p=290#comment-485</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Good article&#8212;I have certainly seen most of these issues crop up.&#160; I would call those who believe that complete programmatic transformation at the touch of the button can be done with minimal upfront work the &#8220;dreamers&#8221; instead of &#8220;believers&#8221;.&#160; I would say the same for those who think off-shore conversion with minimal data analysis and QA can bring the desired results.&#160; So you have both the &#8220;automation dreamers&#8221; and the &#8220;cheap labor dreamers&#8221;.&#160; The truth is that both these approaches can be successful if you apply them with a good understanding of the data, create the proper specification and process for the desired outcome of the conversion, develop tools where they can help, and then QA the whole process.&#160; Two things must be remembered:&#160; 1. in most unstructured to structured data conversion processes there are parts of the process that either can&#8217;t or shouldn&#8217;t be automated. 2. The whole specification and QA process can be time consuming and cannot be outsourced.
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good article&#8212;I have certainly seen most of these issues crop up.&nbsp; I would call those who believe that complete programmatic transformation at the touch of the button can be done with minimal upfront work the &#8220;dreamers&#8221; instead of &#8220;believers&#8221;.&nbsp; I would say the same for those who think off-shore conversion with minimal data analysis and QA can bring the desired results.&nbsp; So you have both the &#8220;automation dreamers&#8221; and the &#8220;cheap labor dreamers&#8221;.&nbsp; The truth is that both these approaches can be successful if you apply them with a good understanding of the data, create the proper specification and process for the desired outcome of the conversion, develop tools where they can help, and then QA the whole process.&nbsp; Two things must be remembered:&nbsp; 1. in most unstructured to structured data conversion processes there are parts of the process that either can&#8217;t or shouldn&#8217;t be automated. 2. The whole specification and QA process can be time consuming and cannot be outsourced.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

